[Update 7/2006: There are signs of a modest improvement — possibly more of a backlash against the violence of the radical left — although these results hardly indicate a groundswell, nor are the questions worded in such a way as to make the data comparable to what is posted below.]
Here is a listing of some of the recent relevant polling data on anti-Americanism in South Korea, with a particular emphasis on the views of younger voters:
June 2003–Pew Global Attitudes Project / Gallup Korea.
719 adults, face-to-face. Margin of error, 3.7%.
- 58% of South Koreans were disappointed that the Iraqi Army did not fight harder outside Baghdad, more than twice the number (26%) who said they were “happy” with the quick Iraqi collapse. This result was within the “moderate” range of opinion in the Muslim world, but far outside results in Europe or North America. In France, for example, the results were very near the opposite.
- The “favorable” view of the United States dropped from 58% in 1999-2000, to 53% in summer 2002, to 46% in summer 2003. Of those with unfavorable views of the United States, more than 80% thought the “problem” was not just Bush, but was at least partly the result of the American people themselves. This latter figure was an outlier among nations surveyed.
- 22% had started boycotting U.S. goods. 29% had considered it. This was the highest number outside the Muslim world.
- Just 24% supported the U.S.-led War on Terror, also a result that fit within the number in the Muslim world.
- However, during the same period, South Korean views of Americans actually increased from 61% to 74% favorable.
South Koreans’ political values:
- Only 43% considered honest and competitive elections a “must,” also in line with views in the Muslim world.
- Only 48% considered it “very important” to live in a country with a free press; fair judicary, 59%; religious freedom, 58%; free speech, 57%. Those were among the lowest survey results in Asia.
- Given two options, which should South Korea rely on? Democratic government, 61%; strong leader, 36%.
- “Our way of life needs to be protected from foreign influence.” 82% agree; 16% disagree. Again, the number was more consistent with African and Middle Eastern views than those in Asia, North America, or Europe.
- On the other hand, just 7% of South Koreans want to “restrict the entry of people into our country,” the lowest result of any country.
- 75% of Koreans, the second-highest number (over Turkey at 76%) believed that the nation’s success “is determined by forces outside our control.”
November 2004, Frontier Times / National Policy Research Center.
In the event of war between the U.S. and North Korea, 20% of South Koreans say their country should take the North’s side; another 30% were undecided. Significant differences by both age and region (in Kwangju, as many people would side with the North as with the U.S.).
- Greatest threat to South Korea’s security: 37.1%, Japan; 28.6%, North Korea; 18.5%, United States, 11.9%, China.
- By contrast, the company’s poll in January 2004 found that 39 percent of the respondents said the United States was the most threatening country to Korea and 33% named North Korea. At that time, only 7.6 percent of those surveyed counted Japan as most threatening. Among respondents in their 20s, 58% said the U.S. was the greatest threat; only 20% said North Korea was (for further contrast, a 1993 Gallup Korea survey found the numbers to be North Korea, 44%; Japan, 15%; China, 4%; and the United States, 1%.
- “Of the respondents who said the United States is threatening, 29.2 percent were in their 20s and 26.4 percent were in their 30s. Only 13. 7 percent in their 40s and 8.1 percent in their 50s said the country threatens Korea. ”
- [S]lightly more than half . . . said inter-Korean economic cooperation and South Korean aid to North Korea should continue, regardless of Pyongyang’s development of nuclear weapons.
- Those in favor of this were predominantly governing Uri Party supporters in their 30s and 40s; those against were largely opposition Grand National supporters, aged 50 or over.
April 2005–Frontier Times and 21st Century Research
Telephone poll of over 1,000 adults, with a margin of error of 3.1%.
- Greatest threat to South Korea’s security: first, the United States (29.5%); second, Japan (29.2%); third, North Korea (18.4%).
- 44.4% of South Koreans believe North Korea’s nukes are good for Korea.
- 45.7% of people in 20s and 50.1% of students believe the U.S. is the number one threat to Korea.
May 2005, Munhwa Ilbo / KSOI (ht: The Marmot)
- If the U.S. unilaterally attacks North Korea, whose side should the South Korean government take? North Korea, 47.6%; the United States, 31.2%. By a narrow margin, even supporters of South Korea’s “conservative” Grand National Party believed that the South should side with the North against the United States.
August 2005, Gallup Korea / Chosun Ilbo
Survey of 833 individuals born between 1980 and 1989.
- In a war between the United States and North Korea, whose side would you take? North Korea, 65.9%; United States, 21.8%; undecided, 12.3%.
- Ironically, when the same respondents were asked where they’d prefer live if they lived abroad, 17.9% named Australia, 16.8% the U.S., and 15.3% Japan. “Fourteen nations including equally uninviting Iraq and Iran did better than North Korea by attracting one respondent each.”
- The conservative Chosun Ilbo, South Korea’s largest-circulation daily, tried to put a bright face on it, calling the results an indicator of “pragmatic patriotism.”
[…] Yeah, well, I’m not sure they’re a majority, but I’d agree that they’ve been pretty silent, and that’s really the root of the entire problem. S. Korean Spymaster Resigns; Fifth Column Scandal Widens […]
[…] She’s not dealing with any statistical depth, but the numbers are bleak. In a 2003 Pew survey, for example, 58% of Koreans expressed regret that the Iraqi Army didn’t fight us harder to defend Baghdad, and a disturbingly high percentage of young Koreans say they’d take North Korea’s side in a U.S.-North Korean conflict.  South Korea’s level of anti-Americanism is actually more typical of numbers for the Middle East than those in Europe or Asia. I also believe that the withdrawal of most of our soldiers from Korea is overdue for both political and military reasons, and because we need those soldiers in other places, like Iraq. Confoundingly, most Koreans also want U.S. forces to stay in Korea, at least in most surveys, and most of them have little use for the protestors or their violent methods. It’s as if they’d miss having someone around to hate. Local sentiment is distinctly against the protests, and those in the nearby village of Anjung-ri are particularly eager for the extra business they are expecting. It’s a mixed picture, but it’s not the picture of an ally we can depend on to protect our flanks. Daechuri has become “ground zero” in the struggle against violent US military extremism. We Americans can no longer sit idly by and turn ignorant blind eyes to what Georgie Bushie does around the globe. The people of such places as Daechuri, Shannon, Pearl Harbor and Iraq are our brothers and sisters whom we are allowing our governments to oppress and suppress. […]
[…] Safe to assume, 99.7% of these condom malfunctions have seen a Jew in their bitter lives. As Robert and others point out, you can get some pretty awful comments on Yahoo threads, too, but I’ve never any with the degree of nearly unanimous venom you see here. I doubt that even Europe would be capable of such a display; once again, Korean views seem more in line with those in the Middle East than with those in the civilized world. […]
[…] The statistical record on anti-Americanism in Korea — I’ve archived a lot of interesting poll results at that post. […]
[…] It would probably be a lot like 2002 and 2003: I mean, what kind of a society would break out into mass mobbery in reaction to one isolated tragic event? Who would turn hatred of a friendly allied nation into fodder for popular movies and songs? Who would use another nation’s most painful living memory as an occasion to show its hatred? Who would discriminate against an entire national group, commit multiple acts of random violence (here, here, here, here, here), or peddle hate to the kiddies in school (here, here, here, with extra points for the approving reference to 9-11)? What nation would seek political advantage from one tragic event by propogating hatred for an entire nation (here, here, and here), much less find it to be a winning electoral strategy? And where would such hatred find broad societal acceptance? Surely not in an educated, developed, industrialized society. No civilized people in our times could subscribe to the inspiration of the world’s most brutal and backward system of government, one that openly espouses racism and is willing to kill as many babies as necessary to prove its commitment to that notion of purity. [Update 8] […]
[…] During the Bush Administration, the Pentagon reduced USFK from 37,000 troops to 29,000, with most of those reductions coming from the Army. This decline was largely driven by the loss of South Korea’s constituency of support among the American conservatives in just six short years. Conservatives watched the ascendancy of the Korean left, its inexhaustible apetite for appeasing North Korea, its general diplomatic incompetence, and its delusional fulminations of America-hate that reached the highest levels of its government. They watched the Korean right fall silent, barely admitting to its support for America or pointing out the benefits that the alliance brings (it stands for nothing and is paying the political price). Overall, South Koreans are as anti-American as many Muslim populations. American conservatives have come to resent this deeply, and on a more detached level, have come to realize that the two countries no longer share enough common goals, interests, or values to support a military commitment as large, expensive, and risky as USFK. […]
[…] As for a wave of anti-Americanism that some “experts” in Korea are threatening, I’m hoping they’re right. The diplomatic classes of both nations have done a fairly expert job of papering over the depth of anti-Americanism there, and I’d be perfectly content to see a reaction that outrageously irrational get enough press for a few U.S. presidential candidates to start talking about troop withdrawals (remember this?). First, such talk would almost immediately shut up some of Korea’s professional demagogues, whose conniving calculations we tend to underestimate. They know what a precipitous withdrawal could do to their economy. Second, a major U.S. troop presence in Korea doesn’t serve sufficient U.S. interests to be worth its financial cost, or to be worth tying soldiers down where they’re no longer needed. Third, our troop presence is doing us more political and diplomatic harm than it does us diplomatic and military good. Finally, our troop presence puts American hostages within the range of hostile guns and thus limits our options in dealing with North Korea. […]
[…] I have compiled other statistics on anti-Americanism in South Korea here. […]
[…] Are they going to do it? I doubt it. Both South Korea and Saudi Arabia are allies… […]our alliance with South Korea today is one of the world’s most lopsided in terms of the mutual flow of benefits. South Korea has been useless or worse as an ally against the terrorists, extraordinarily unhelpful with North Korea, an irritant in our regional security framework (since Japan is a part of that), and a self-declared neutral in checking China’s regional ambitions. South Korea is actually cutting its own military, leaving American taxpayers to take up the slack. There doesn’t seem to be much South Korean gratitude for this expensive commitment, either, judging by displays like these, or polls that consistently show South Korea to be one of the most anti-American countries in Asia. […]
[…] Read the numbers, starting with the mandatory disclaimer: yes, public opinion in Korea shifts wildly over short periods of time, small sample sizes, loaded questions, etcetera, fine, whatever. They still show a Korea that’s steadily shifted away from a strategic convergence on North Korea that was the foundation of the U.S.-Korea alliance. Roh Moo-Hyun didn’t lead the Korean people to those views; he began as a reflection of the peak of sentiments stirred by a newly influential group of 386 radicals and then let loose a flood of noxious emissions from labor unions, schoolteachers, extremist professors, celebrities, media figures large and small, and — yes – North Korean agents, much of it subsidized, nurtured, presented, or protected by his government or his party, while differing views were suppressed. Time will reveal how persistent this brainwashing has been. […]
its kinda weird…as a Korean currently living in the US…a lot of Korean teenagers listen to American music,wear Abercrombie&Fitch,learn English,admire ABC(American Born Child-(particularly Chinese and other Asians)people who are born in the US or have lived in the US for a long time) Korean celebrities like Tiffany and Tablo,and at the same time they think America is taking advantage on them and all!What in the world are they thinking?When the American troops withdraw,then obviously N.Korea will invade and attack them!Kim Jong-Il said that the Korean reunification is impossible unless the US troops withdraw from the S.Korea.He is trying to invade South Korea because everybody knows that North Korea’s military is way stronger than South Korea’s.They take this right for granted and act all anti-American?That sounds pretty stupid.The Korean War is NOT over yet,people!!!I guess this is because of all the Communist influences over South Korea now.There are a number of Commies in the media industry and they’re all like,â€Oh my gosh,those Americans are trying to take over us!â€.What the…
Korean people,I don’t care if you call me “white-washed†or “yankee wannabe†or whatever.Just face it.Without the American troops,North Korea WILL invade South Korea and then South Korea would collapse. So STOP acting all anti-American like this.Americans are actually guarding our country.Can we at least show some respect?I’m not saying that we should worship Bush or anything like that,but being anti-American is just really stupid.
Sometimes the conservatives play the card too. Sometimes, for many, it is just about nationalism. Even Park Chung Hee could play it for the masses. Thinking about it as nationalism also explains the irrationality of much of it too. That is why the same South Koreans would never dream of voting USFK out of the country…
Thanks for the post! Wow, that is very interesting – is there a place where I could see the results for each country for this poll?