One Free Korea OneFreeKorea freekorea.us home faq about news blogs plan-b camps interviews google earth

“This is not how allies deal with each other.”

Just how bad are things between the United States and South Korea these days?

“As the talks went on, Mr. Powell stiffened. Mr. Yoon practically told him that Seoul would link the nuclear issue with the troop dispatch,” the official said. The New York Times reported that South Korea had told the United States it would not consider sending more troops to Iraq unless Washington made a concession to Pyeongyang. South Korean officials said later, however, that Mr. Yoon’s message was not that strong. ”

At the meeting, Mr. Yoon read Seoul’s instructions, and he handed a book, “Crisis on the Korean Peninsula: How to Deal with a Nuclear North Korea,” to Mr. Powell.” The book was written by Michael O’Hanlon and Mike Mochizuki, two U.S. foreign policy analysts. “The book argued for comprehensive resolution of the North Korean issues,” the official said. “After listening to Mr. Yoon’s explanation, Mr. Powell became extremely angry.” U.S. media quoted Mr. Powell as curtly telling Mr. Yoon at the talks, “That is not how allies deal with each other.”

The Yoon-Powell meeting had continuing effects. The atmosphere at the South Korea-U.S.-Japan talks on Sept. 29-30, 2003, to coordinate the North Korea’s nuclear issue was also tense.

Read the whole thing.

OneFreeKorea » The Death of an Alliance, Part 61: S. Korea’s Withdrawal from Withdrawal said,

December 2, 2006 @ 8:37 pm

[…] The other reason Korea sent troops was to buy a softer U.S. line toward North Korea.  On balance, removing even a portion of this claim on our North Korea policy means much more than the Zaitun Brigade’s presence meant for Iraq’s, or America’s, security. […]

Totten on the ROK Army in Iraq at ROK Drop said,

March 20, 2007 @ 6:36 am

[…] I have been against the Zaytun unit deployment from the beginning due to the political costs the Koreans were demanding along with the fact that if a mass casualty event happened the anti-US hate groups and demagogue politicians in Korea would use it to advance their own anti-US agendas.  Fortunately Kurdistan has turned out to be safer for ROK Army soldiers than remaining in Korea where the ROK Army in the last couple of years has lost numerous soldiers to accidents and multiple shooting rampages.  By comparison, not one ROK Army soldier has been killed in Kurdistan.  […]

Outsourcing the Zaytun Unit at ROK Drop said,

August 9, 2007 @ 3:56 pm

[…] Just for the record I have been against the Zaytun deployment since before the unit was ever deployed because I figured the unit would not be allowed to do much of anything meaningful which is evident by the fact they can’t go to the market to buy cloth.  Plus if there was a mass casualty attack or as we see with the Taliban, a pro-longed hostage crisis, the anti-US groups, politicians, and media would waste no time capitalizing on it.  Additionally, the Korean government would expect unrealistic political benefits from the dispatch.  […]

Zaytun to Stay in Iraq? at ROK Drop said,

September 10, 2007 @ 4:16 pm

[…] Just for the record I have been against the Zaytun deployment since before the unit was ever deployed because I figured the unit would not be allowed to do much of anything meaningful which is evident by the fact they can’t even go to a local market place to buy supplies in the highly friendly and secure Kurdish region of Iraq.  They did do a good job with the toilets though.  Plus if there was a mass casualty attack or as we saw with the Taliban, a pro-longed hostage crisis, the anti-US groups, politicians, and media would waste no time capitalizing on it.  Additionally, the Korean government would expect unrealistic political benefits from the dispatch.  […]

Zaytun Unit Iraq Deployment Extended at ROK Drop said,

October 23, 2007 @ 5:56 pm

[…] I have been against the Zaytun deployment since before the unit was ever deployed because I figured the unit would not be allowed to do much of anything meaningful which is evident by the fact they can’t even go to a local market place to buy supplies in the highly friendly and secure Kurdish region of Iraq.  They did do a good job with the toilets though.  Plus if there was a mass casualty attack or as we saw with the Taliban, a pro-longed hostage crisis, the anti-US groups, politicians, and media in Korea would waste no time capitalizing on it.  Additionally, the Korean government will expect unrealistic political benefits from the dispatch of the troops.  […]

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment