<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for 15 Oct 07</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kauffner</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/comment-page-1/#comment-55146</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kauffner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/#comment-55146</guid>
		<description>By all accounts, China was pretty upset with North Korea over the &quot;nuclear&quot; test last year, so I don&#039;t think they actually want North Korea to have nukes. Japan would respond with a nuclear program of it&#039;s own and that would undermine China status as the Asian superpower. I assume it was Chinese twisting that forced NK to signed the agreement in February. As near as I can tell, the U.S. paid NK $300 million in exchange for warmed over lies and a meaningless peice of paper. Yongbyon was closed? Rickety old thing was just about to fall apart anyway. So, thanks, China, but no thanks. All that Chinese cash flooding into Hillary&#039;s campaign must ultimately come from Beijing, so perhaps we should think in terms of China enlisting the U.S. rather than vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all accounts, China was pretty upset with North Korea over the &#8220;nuclear&#8221; test last year, so I don&#8217;t think they actually want North Korea to have nukes. Japan would respond with a nuclear program of it&#8217;s own and that would undermine China status as the Asian superpower. I assume it was Chinese twisting that forced NK to signed the agreement in February. As near as I can tell, the U.S. paid NK $300 million in exchange for warmed over lies and a meaningless peice of paper. Yongbyon was closed? Rickety old thing was just about to fall apart anyway. So, thanks, China, but no thanks. All that Chinese cash flooding into Hillary&#8217;s campaign must ultimately come from Beijing, so perhaps we should think in terms of China enlisting the U.S. rather than vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Chen</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/comment-page-1/#comment-54996</link>
		<dc:creator>James Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/#comment-54996</guid>
		<description>The border between Burma and Thailand is long and porous.  Hopefully, some real freedom fighters are moving guns and ammo across right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The border between Burma and Thailand is long and porous.  Hopefully, some real freedom fighters are moving guns and ammo across right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPRK Forum &#187; Joshua&#8217;s take on the nuclear test site fence</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/comment-page-1/#comment-54959</link>
		<dc:creator>DPRK Forum &#187; Joshua&#8217;s take on the nuclear test site fence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/#comment-54959</guid>
		<description>[...] One Free Korea has an interesting take on the nuclear test site fence. Apparently, it has been reported the security has been beefed up around the area, and then Joshua points out what others may have missed: It may not be about the test site. It is near camp 16.      [?]  Share This  Sphere: Related Content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One Free Korea has an interesting take on the nuclear test site fence. Apparently, it has been reported the security has been beefed up around the area, and then Joshua points out what others may have missed: It may not be about the test site. It is near camp 16.      [?]  Share This  Sphere: Related Content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Korea Blog &#187; Links for 15 Oct 07</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/comment-page-1/#comment-54938</link>
		<dc:creator>North Korea Blog &#187; Links for 15 Oct 07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2007/10/15/links-for-15-oct-07/#comment-54938</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more of this story&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more of this story&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

