<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Korea to push U.N. for return of its POW&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freekorea.us/2008/01/12/south-korea-to-push-un-for-return-of-its-pows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/01/12/south-korea-to-push-un-for-return-of-its-pows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are You NKay? &#124; North Korean Human Rights Live - Oh No (and other links)</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/01/12/south-korea-to-push-un-for-return-of-its-pows/comment-page-1/#comment-56140</link>
		<dc:creator>Are You NKay? &#124; North Korean Human Rights Live - Oh No (and other links)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2008/01/12/south-korea-to-push-un-for-return-of-its-pows/#comment-56140</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Also, Lee is also pushing for the release of POW&#8217;s still held in the North (Via. OFK). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Also, Lee is also pushing for the release of POW&#8217;s still held in the North (Via. OFK). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usinkorea</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/01/12/south-korea-to-push-un-for-return-of-its-pows/comment-page-1/#comment-56100</link>
		<dc:creator>usinkorea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2008/01/12/south-korea-to-push-un-for-return-of-its-pows/#comment-56100</guid>
		<description>I wrote about this extensively on my blog - not specifically about the POW issue extensively but about the &quot;tipping point&quot; idea.

It will be very interesting to watch how NK reacts to what has been coming out of the Lee camp so early on - like the Unification Ministry axing or down sizing and especially the POW issue as well as the West Sea dead and pro-US notes.

Given how NK is --- they will have to respond to this stuff, and how they respond will give me - I believe - some idea of how little or much North Korea is still hurting.

Basically, I believe NK believes it can&#039;t appear weak - whether from a  internal or external view point ---- and it will take the Lee camp&#039;s statements as a challenge, but it still needs stuff from SK and has to calculate how much it might piss off China or deminish Washington&#039;s desire to pursue our own Sunshine Policy since Bush&#039;s flipflop.

I think we stand at least a real chance that we might see the setting off of a chain of events that takes Lee and NK and perhaps the US far down a path none of them want to go.

Just from the handful of things I know about Lee, he doesn&#039;t seem like the kind of person who would back down easily if challenged by the North.

And though I think his primary NK policy will be to keep the North alive, Pyongyang might force his hand (and America&#039;s) by how it reacts to what I consider Lee just playing to his South Korea base.

This year and early 2009 should be interesting to watch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about this extensively on my blog &#8211; not specifically about the POW issue extensively but about the &#8220;tipping point&#8221; idea.</p>
<p>It will be very interesting to watch how NK reacts to what has been coming out of the Lee camp so early on &#8211; like the Unification Ministry axing or down sizing and especially the POW issue as well as the West Sea dead and pro-US notes.</p>
<p>Given how NK is &#8212; they will have to respond to this stuff, and how they respond will give me &#8211; I believe &#8211; some idea of how little or much North Korea is still hurting.</p>
<p>Basically, I believe NK believes it can&#8217;t appear weak &#8211; whether from a  internal or external view point &#8212;- and it will take the Lee camp&#8217;s statements as a challenge, but it still needs stuff from SK and has to calculate how much it might piss off China or deminish Washington&#8217;s desire to pursue our own Sunshine Policy since Bush&#8217;s flipflop.</p>
<p>I think we stand at least a real chance that we might see the setting off of a chain of events that takes Lee and NK and perhaps the US far down a path none of them want to go.</p>
<p>Just from the handful of things I know about Lee, he doesn&#8217;t seem like the kind of person who would back down easily if challenged by the North.</p>
<p>And though I think his primary NK policy will be to keep the North alive, Pyongyang might force his hand (and America&#8217;s) by how it reacts to what I consider Lee just playing to his South Korea base.</p>
<p>This year and early 2009 should be interesting to watch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

