<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Hill Resignation Watch:  National Review on Agreed Framework 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/comment-page-1/#comment-57768</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/#comment-57768</guid>
		<description>I knew I&#039;d regret following that link.  Most editorials and columns in Korean papers make you marvel for what sort of crap people can be paid to write.  That goes double for the Hanky.  The piece is predictably groundless, unsupported, and contradicted by most of the available reliable evidence, which suggests that the disclosure was all about North Korea.  It begins with a pantheon of villiany (one which excludes Kim Jong Il, naturally) and fills in its accusations later.  Never mind that there&#039;s no actual evidence to support this theory.

Oh, and Treasury&#039;s BDA sanctions were announced on September 15th, and North Korea signed that deal four days later, on September 19th.  Of course, North Korea creatively reinterpreted the deal later that day, demanding a light water reactor up front.  In fact, behind the bluster, North Korea is most likely to make concessions when under pressure.

Is anyone else gobsmacked by the fact that the Administration keeps a story like this secret for 7 months, and people theorize conspiracies not about the coverup but about the disclosure?  I certainly smell a rat, but it&#039;s the coverup -- which was dissolving rapidly under a stream of leaks -- that upsets me.

By the way, good to hear from you again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew I&#8217;d regret following that link.  Most editorials and columns in Korean papers make you marvel for what sort of crap people can be paid to write.  That goes double for the Hanky.  The piece is predictably groundless, unsupported, and contradicted by most of the available reliable evidence, which suggests that the disclosure was all about North Korea.  It begins with a pantheon of villiany (one which excludes Kim Jong Il, naturally) and fills in its accusations later.  Never mind that there&#8217;s no actual evidence to support this theory.</p>
<p>Oh, and Treasury&#8217;s BDA sanctions were announced on September 15th, and North Korea signed that deal four days later, on September 19th.  Of course, North Korea creatively reinterpreted the deal later that day, demanding a light water reactor up front.  In fact, behind the bluster, North Korea is most likely to make concessions when under pressure.</p>
<p>Is anyone else gobsmacked by the fact that the Administration keeps a story like this secret for 7 months, and people theorize conspiracies not about the coverup but about the disclosure?  I certainly smell a rat, but it&#8217;s the coverup &#8212; which was dissolving rapidly under a stream of leaks &#8212; that upsets me.</p>
<p>By the way, good to hear from you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranckay</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/comment-page-1/#comment-57765</link>
		<dc:creator>oranckay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/#comment-57765</guid>
		<description>Dunno if you&#039;ve seen this, but Hani&#039;s new editor in chief, recently back from a year in Washington, has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_opinion/284533.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fun theory&lt;/a&gt; about the Syrian-connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno if you&#8217;ve seen this, but Hani&#8217;s new editor in chief, recently back from a year in Washington, has a <a href="http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_opinion/284533.html" rel="nofollow">fun theory</a> about the Syrian-connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/comment-page-1/#comment-57760</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/#comment-57760</guid>
		<description>Dan, I found your messages and am putting up a post.  Your pictures are amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I found your messages and am putting up a post.  Your pictures are amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danb</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/comment-page-1/#comment-57759</link>
		<dc:creator>danb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freekorea.us/2008/04/27/chris-hill-resignation-watch-national-review-on-agreed-framework-20/#comment-57759</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh, you may just be really busy, but otherwise I think your spam filter must be working overtime.  I&#039;ve put up a bunch of photos from Sunday&#039;s protests.  Anyway, please check your email spam folder for a few messages over the last several days (and go ahead and delete this).  thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh, you may just be really busy, but otherwise I think your spam filter must be working overtime.  I&#8217;ve put up a bunch of photos from Sunday&#8217;s protests.  Anyway, please check your email spam folder for a few messages over the last several days (and go ahead and delete this).  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

