Oops, We Changed the Wrong Regime

People can differ about the merits of  overthrowing noxious regimes  and the  various ways  that can be pursued, but I’m guessing this is one item  Condoleezza Rice wasn’t  pursuing for her legacy showcase:  Rice’s  sudden  turnabout on  de-listing North  Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism may soon plunge  the Japanese government into crisis

Japan must now  decide whether to join the United States in providing aid to a country that kidnaps and refuses to account for unknown numbers of its citizens, something that would force its government to choose between its most important alliance and overwhelming and strong public opinion.  Japan’s ruling  Liberal Democratic Party  is now  visibly split  over this issue.  One of the strongest critics is former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe:

Abe also emphasized the necessity of maintaining international sanctions on North Korea, saying, “U.S. President George W. Bush said he would never forget about the abduction issue, so I think there still is room for the international community to cooperate to put pressure on the country.”

Besides Abe, many LDP lawmakers also have voiced concern over the U.S. stance on North Korea.

“The United States always jumps to hasty decisions as a presidential election approaches,” LDP Secretary General Bunmei Ibuki said in a lecture in Nara on Friday night. “Former [U.S.] President Bill Clinton ended up being duped by Pyongyang [as he failed to achieve North Korea’s denuclearization]. The government should clearly express its opinions to the U.S. government.”

Abe and other lawmakers have so far refrained from directly criticizing Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda’s diplomatic approach toward North Korea. However, former Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Takeo Hiranuma, who chairs a suprapartisan group of lawmakers seeking the swift return of Japanese abductees and who has close ties with Abe, said to reporters Friday: “Japan has lost a big bargaining chip in resolving the abduction issue. If Japan hastily takes measures to partially ease economic sanctions against North Korea, it won’t bode well for Fukuda’s administration.”  [Yomiuri Shimbun]

One potential beneficiary of public discontent with the LDP might be the Democratic Party of Japan:

DPJ President Ichiro Ozawa criticized the government for insufficient handling of the matter, stressing that the U.S. action is based on “˜”˜its own global strategy and its own interests.”

Sharing a similar view, a senior ruling Liberal Democratic Party lawmaker said, “˜”˜The United States is behaving without regard for others. The logic is that they want to settle the matter during the (President George W) Bush administration.”   [Japan Today]

Beneath a veneer of mature statesmanship seldom seen on the other side of the Sea of Japan, the Japanese are seething at the American betrayal, and at  their own impotence to stop it.  The Japanese are now grasping at the obvious deficiencies of the North Korean declaration itself as their last line of defense.  If Congress lets the Administration de-list North Korea anyway, recriminations in Japan will undoubtedly deepen.  I don’t doubt that to plenty of Japanese statesmen, the lesson taken from this will be the importance of building a security framework less dependent on America.

Below the fold, I’ve posted the transcript of  a brief press conference in Kyoto with Condi Rice and the Japanese Foreign Minister a few days ago  (thanks for a reader).  The takeaway is this response from Foreign Minister Komura, which should be read in light of the art of Japanese understatement:

I’d like to answer to that question from the Japanese press, that on the ““ about the blast of the cooling tower, it might ““ it is not right to — too much focus on that issue.  But it is also unfair that it is meaningless.  And there is also the mentioning that ““ the worrying about the Japan-U.S. alliances, but neither of — myself and Secretary Rice like to please North Korea by endangering the Japan-U.S. alliance.  And I think this is not the interest of anybody. 

Komura  appears to have  crafted those words carefully, and he was ready to say them without being prompted by a reporter. 

Oddly enough, the same crowd that was so recently  wringing its hands  about us alienating our loyal allies in South Korea  has nothing to say  as  Condi Rice’s elbow  could very well  bump over the Prime Minister of our most important Pacific ally, one whose contributions to regional stability and global prosperity far outweigh South Korea’s.  How ironic it would be if North Korean nuclear blackmail and terrorism, helped by Rice’s masterstroke of vainglorious ineptitude, manages to take down Japan’s government and split its alliance with America

Remarks,  Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice And Japanese Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura

June 27, 2008, Kyoto, Japan

FOREIGN MINISTER KOMURA:  (Via interpreter.)   Now we’ve just finished our talks and first of all, the Japan-U.S. relationship is so important.  So needless to say, I agree with Secretary Rice that Japan and the U.S. will continue its close partnership. 

On North Korea, I and Secretary Rice reaffirmed that it is important to advance both denuclearization, as well as Japan-DPRK relations, including the abduction issue.  On the nuclear issues, it is necessary to soundly verify the declaration by the North Korea.  And our ultimate goal is the abandonment of the nuclear programs by North Korea.  So on that point, Japan and the United States must also cooperate and that’s our agreement.  And on the abduction issue, I received a very powerful, strong message from Secretary Rice that the United States will support Japan’s position, and also, there will be no change on the United States’ position on this issue. 

And on the climate change, the G-8 summit meeting as well as the M-E-M, MEM, Major Economics Meeting, about to be held in Toyako*, and Japan and the United States will also maintain its close partnership.  And both myself and Secretary Rice believe that the G-8 Foreign Ministers meeting produce a great outcome.  And on the issue of Afghanistan and Zimbabwe, we could send a strong message.

SECRETARY RICE:  Thank you very much, Minister, for hosting me.  I want, again, to thank the people of Kyoto for the wonderful arrangements here.  There has been great warmth and friendliness from the people, despite the fact that I’m sure we’ve made it a little bit harder to get around.  We’ve had a good discussion of our bilateral issues, including our efforts to modernize the alliance through the work that the 2+2 has done on defense realignment. 

We have had a very good discussion of the North Korea issue and affirmed, again, that the next important step is for North Korea to cooperate fully so that we can verify the completeness and the accuracy of the declaration that it has submitted, and so that we can move forward on our ultimate goal, the North’s complete abandonment of its nuclear weapons and its nuclear programs.

I reaffirmed to the Minister ““ I also affirmed to the Minister again what the President said yesterday, which is the United States will never forget the Japanese citizens who were abducted, and we will continue to press North Korea to resolve this issue early and in a positive manner.  It is extremely important to the United States, as a matter of American policy, that this issue be resolved.

Finally, we did discuss the upcoming G-8 Heads of State meeting and had an opportunity to talk, in particular, about climate change, where Japan and the United States are cooperating, both on the major economies meeting and, most especially, looking forward to Japanese leadership on this issue at the G-8.

So we will continue our close cooperation and our consultation.  And thank you, again, for hosting me here, and later on tonight for the trilateral meeting that we will hold with our Australian colleague, Foreign Minister Smith.

MODERATOR:  We would like to take a question, one question each; first from Japanese press, then the U.S. press.

QUESTION:  (Via interpreter.)   Just a few hours ago, it was broadcasted on CNN, the blast ““ the blowing up of the cooling tower in Yongbyon in North Korea.  But that cooling tower is already not working and it’s almost disabled.  So the — we are wondering, what is the importance of that in blowing up?

And the second question is that President Bush stated that he will never forget the victims of the abduction; however, the ““ especially the Japanese people ““ especially the families of the victims have a very negative sentiment and the feeling ““ are very worried about that — this time, the United States movement.  So if there’s any message from the United States to the family of the victims — like to share?

SECRETARY RICE:  Yes, thank you.  As to the blowing up of the cooling tower, it is a part of the disablement.  In many ways, the disablement has been going on for several months now.  This was an active reactor.  Let us remember that this is a reactor that was making plutonium, that made enough plutonium for several devices, including one that was tested in 2006.  So it is important to put North Korea out of the plutonium business.  But that will not be the end of the story.  We also must deal with proliferation.  We must deal with highly enriched uranium.  We must verifiably end all of North Korea’s programs.

And even that is not the end of the story, because in order for North Korea to enter, in some way, the international community of states, it will have to deal with the many issues, including human rights issues, and that brings me to the abduction issue.

I would say to the families — and by the way, President Bush was very moved by his meeting with them — and I would say to the Japanese people, the United States considers the case of the abducted Japanese citizens as a humanitarian and a moral cause.

This is a terrible, terrible thing that North Korea did.  And they must be accountable for it and they must resolve the issue.  The United States has pressed very hard to have the DPRK sit down with Japan and find a way to resolve this, and we are going to continue to press this case at every opportunity.  And the United States retains, very much, plenty of leverage to deal with North Korea going forward. 

When the President spoke, he said North Korea remains ““ will remain one of the most heavily sanctioned nations in the world.  The sanctions that North Korea faces for its human rights violations, its nuclear test in 2006, and its weapons proliferation will all stay in effect.  And all United Nations Security Council station ““ sanctions will stay in effect as well.

And so there is still much that North Korea seeks from the United States.  This is not the end of the story. 

MODERATOR:  U.S. press, please. 

QUESTION:  Thank you.  Susan Cornwell with Reuters.  Madame Secretary, will the United Nations Security Council consider sanctions against Zimbabwe next week?  And if so, what sanctions might they consider?  And lastly, is there a possibility of some kind of peacekeeping force?  Because I think Morgan Tsvangirai has suggested that. 

SECRETARY RICE:  Yes.  Well, we are going to consult with the South African Development Community, with the AU.  We have consulted today with our G-8 counterparts.  There was a strong, strong sentiment in that room today, that what is going on in Zimbabwe is simply unacceptable in the 21st century and cannot be ignored by the international community.  And that is why the statement speaks to the legitimacy of anything that ““ any government that comes out of those sham elections today. 

You know that the United States has widespread sanctions on Zimbabwe and individuals already.  But I think it’s fair to say that those operating in Zimbabwe should know that there are those in the international community who believe that the Security Council should consider sanctions.  And since the United States is the president of the Security Council until the end of the month, we intend to bring up the issue of Zimbabwe in the Council and we will see what the Council decides to do. 

FOREIGN MINISTER KOMURA:  (Via interpreter.)   I’d like to answer to that question from the Japanese press, that on the ““ about the blast of the cooling tower, it might ““ it is not right to — too much focus on that issue.  But it is also unfair that it is meaningless.  And there is also the mentioning that ““ the worrying about the Japan-U.S. alliances, but neither of — myself and Secretary Rice like to please North Korea by endangering the Japan-U.S. alliance.  And I think this is not the interest of anybody.  So I’d like to seek the cooperation for the good ““ the alliance relationship between Japan and the United States. 



# # #


  1. I guess Condi fell asleep at State and was replaced by a pod person–what a f*cking waste of potential.


  2. Rice’s June 26 op-ed in WSJ, “Diplomacy Is Working on North Korea” (doesn’t she mean “in” or “for” NK?):



    “North Korea now faces a clear choice about its future. If it chooses confrontation – violating international law, pursuing nuclear weapons, and threatening the region – it will face serious consequences not only from the United States, but also from Japan, South Korea, China and Russia, as it did in 2006 after testing a nuclear device.” Huh???


    “Similarly, we know that North Korea proliferated nuclear technology to Syria, but we do not know whether that is the end of the story. Rather than just trying to address this threat unilaterally, we will be more effective in learning about North Korean proliferation and preventing its continuation through a cooperative effort with Japan, South Korea, China and Russia.” Oh, OK. I get it now. Good luck.


    “Considering North Korea’s track record, verification is essential, but still it must be asked: What if North Korea cheats? The answer is simple: We will hold North Korea accountable. We will reimpose any applicable sanctions that we have waived – plus add new ones. And because North Korea would be violating an agreement not only with us, but also with all of its neighbors, those countries would take appropriate measures as well.” Phew. Thank God for multilateralism!

    Sum Total:

    The General and his men laughing their guts out at the American government’s complicity in North Korean proliferation/perfidy and the American public’s susceptibility to feel-good diplomacy.


  3. I’m beginning to believe that the vaunted Dear General, who, as you know, never served a day in the military, is after all a great invincible strategist. How else could one explain this victory, with certainly more smaller victories to come in the coming months?

    A leader of a beggar-state that produces nothing competitive on the world market save for missiles, nuclear material, and contrabands, a dictator par excellence who rules a starving nation of some 23 million through totalitarian control the likes of which the world has never seen before, so deftly able to toy with two US presidents in succession over some 16 years. That’s surely one for the record books.