<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Updated) North Korea, Which Was Removed from the List of State Sponsors of Terrorism Last Year &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:34:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/comment-page-1/#comment-69906</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/#comment-69906</guid>
		<description>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6955351.ece

Well it appears Iran wasn&#039;t after peaceful nuclear tech after all! Who knew??? 

Iran is looking more and more like the final destination for these weapons. Iranian intellegence probably caught wind of the leak and wanted to take precautions. The document probably includes a lot of undisclosed information, locations and such, and now the evidence is undeniable. 

The cargo, specifically the SAM parts, makes me think Iran is worried about being attacked. They could have been planning to retrofit their AA defenses at the nuclear sites, to defend against possible Israeli air strike.

If this is the case, what the Thai&#039;s did was not just confiscate some arms. They very well could have changed the course of Iran&#039;s nuclear development. Now all that&#039;s left is to fuel the Falcon&#039;s, Kfir&#039;s, or whatever and light the burners</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6955351.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6955351.ece</a></p>
<p>Well it appears Iran wasn&#8217;t after peaceful nuclear tech after all! Who knew??? </p>
<p>Iran is looking more and more like the final destination for these weapons. Iranian intellegence probably caught wind of the leak and wanted to take precautions. The document probably includes a lot of undisclosed information, locations and such, and now the evidence is undeniable. </p>
<p>The cargo, specifically the SAM parts, makes me think Iran is worried about being attacked. They could have been planning to retrofit their AA defenses at the nuclear sites, to defend against possible Israeli air strike.</p>
<p>If this is the case, what the Thai&#8217;s did was not just confiscate some arms. They very well could have changed the course of Iran&#8217;s nuclear development. Now all that&#8217;s left is to fuel the Falcon&#8217;s, Kfir&#8217;s, or whatever and light the burners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/comment-page-1/#comment-69905</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/#comment-69905</guid>
		<description>I am surprised that Iran can&#039;t buy its weapons from the Russians directly, rather than getting rather less sophisticated North Korean weapons. Do we need a no-fly zone around the coast, like Iraq in the 1990s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised that Iran can&#8217;t buy its weapons from the Russians directly, rather than getting rather less sophisticated North Korean weapons. Do we need a no-fly zone around the coast, like Iraq in the 1990s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Stanton</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/comment-page-1/#comment-69876</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/#comment-69876</guid>
		<description>If the destination was really Pakistan, there are much darker possibilities than even that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the destination was really Pakistan, there are much darker possibilities than even that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GI Korea</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/comment-page-1/#comment-69875</link>
		<dc:creator>GI Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freekorea.us/2009/12/12/north-korea-which-was-removed-from-the-list-of-state-sponsors-of-terrorism-last-year/#comment-69875</guid>
		<description>Reports say that the weapons final destination was Pakistan.  I am wondering if those surface to air missiles are intended to be given to the Taliban to target US military helicopters with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reports say that the weapons final destination was Pakistan.  I am wondering if those surface to air missiles are intended to be given to the Taliban to target US military helicopters with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

