<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Pursues Dual Strategy on Sanctions Compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freekorea.us/2010/01/03/china-pursues-dual-strategy-on-sanctions-compliance-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freekorea.us/2010/01/03/china-pursues-dual-strategy-on-sanctions-compliance-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:07:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Cathcart</title>
		<link>http://freekorea.us/2010/01/03/china-pursues-dual-strategy-on-sanctions-compliance-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70257</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Cathcart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freekorea.us/2010/01/03/china-pursues-dual-strategy-on-sanctions-compliance-2/#comment-70257</guid>
		<description>According to Chosun Ilbo, &lt;a href=&quot;http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/12/31/2009123101994.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;China is appointing a new ambassador to the ROK&lt;/a&gt;.  But his being US- rather than Pyongyang-educated may not be indicative of anything.  For whatever reason, the Chinese embassy in Seoul hasn&#039;t yet made an announcement or yet  confirmed the news.    

I wonder to what extent China&#039;s apparent friction with the ROK, rather than some tacit desire to annoy the United States or simply make money, would motivate the kind of cooperation with North Korea as asserted in the Washington Times.   In any case, it would seem to be shaping up as a rocky year for PRC-ROK relations, and the CCP doesn&#039;t have much to gain domestically (their bottom line as always) by cracking down on North Korea, especially if it appears to be at the behest of their fellow &quot;stakeholders&quot; in the international community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Chosun Ilbo, <a href="http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/12/31/2009123101994.html" rel="nofollow">China is appointing a new ambassador to the ROK</a>.  But his being US- rather than Pyongyang-educated may not be indicative of anything.  For whatever reason, the Chinese embassy in Seoul hasn&#8217;t yet made an announcement or yet  confirmed the news.    </p>
<p>I wonder to what extent China&#8217;s apparent friction with the ROK, rather than some tacit desire to annoy the United States or simply make money, would motivate the kind of cooperation with North Korea as asserted in the Washington Times.   In any case, it would seem to be shaping up as a rocky year for PRC-ROK relations, and the CCP doesn&#8217;t have much to gain domestically (their bottom line as always) by cracking down on North Korea, especially if it appears to be at the behest of their fellow &#8220;stakeholders&#8221; in the international community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

