The Warmbiers sue North Korea

WHILE THE WORLD IS AGOG AT THE SIGHT OF KIM JONG-UN’S impersonation of a human being, Fred and Cindy Warmbier wish to remind you of his true character by sharing with you what their son—or what was left of him—was like when he came home from North Korea. Yesterday, they filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the North Korean government for the wrongful death of Otto WarmbierI downloaded the complaint from PACER.

Warmber v DPRK

An excerpt:

38. Otto’s parents were at the airport in Cincinnati when the plane carrying Otto landed. When they arrived on the plane, they were stunned to see his condition. Otto was blind and deaf. He had a shaved head, a feeding tube coming out of his nose, was jerking violently and howling, and was completely unresponsive to any of their efforts to comfort him. They also noticed that his once straight teeth were now misaligned and had been forced into abnormal positions, particularly in the front of his mouth.

39. Otto was transported to the medical center at UC Health where physicians conducted a number of tests. Based on those tests and their observations, they concluded that he was severely brain damaged and that his condition was unrecoverable. They also concluded that his extensive loss of brain tissue was caused by an earlier hypoxic-ischemic brain injury caused by the cessation or severe reduction of blood flow to the brain. When Otto originally traveled to North Korea, he was a healthy and physically active young man and had no physical condition that would cause the cessation or severe reduction of blood flow to the brain that occurred while he was in North Korean custody.

At the crux of the Warmbiers’ case is a chronology of motive and causation. The regime in Pyongyang took him as a hostage days before its January 2016 nuclear test, and then inflicted ultimately fatal wounds on him to punish the U.S. government and President Obama for subsequently signing the NKSPEA, pushing for U.N. Security Council Resolution 2270, signing Executive Order 13722, and publishing a round of sanctions designations. I offered a chronology and a similar theory in this post, shortly after Warmbier’s “release.” A key detail revealed in the complaint lends support to that theory:

40. A highly incomplete set of medical records that arrived from North Korea with Otto showed that brain damage existed on a scan dated April 2016, a month after his trial.

And of course, this (and often, far worse) happens to uncounted North Koreans every day, year after year, beyond the reach of our sight and our concern.

But perhaps for one American family, there will be justice of a sort. The designation of North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism opens the gates for more suits for Pyongyang’s acts of “torture, extrajudicial killing, aircraft sabotage, hostage taking,” and material support to terrorists, under the terrorism exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.((North Korea has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism. President Bush removed North Korea from the list of state sponsors of terrorism on October 11, 2008. President Trump re-listed it on November 17, 2017. Discuss among yourselves.)) The Warmbiers are the latest of many American plaintiffs to sue North Korea for its terrorism or torture — from the Rev. Kim Dong-sik to the victims of the Lod Airport Massacre, to the tortured, defiant crewmen of the U.S.S. Pueblo. The total amount of all of these judgments combined was approaching $1 billion when I last added them up a few years ago.

The good news is that the designation of North Korea means that the Warmbiers should be able to seek compensation from a special fund created by the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act. The bad news is that the North Koreans won’t be the ones who pay for what they did to this poor kid. Instead, it will be the French bank BNP Paribas that will bear the cost. The $8.9 billion settlement it reached with the feds for violating Iran, Sudan, Cuba and Burma (but not North Korea) sanctions constituted such a massive sum that Congress used it to create a special fund to compensate the American victims of international terrorism. One can only hope that some other bank that is laundering money for North Korea today will be prosecuted for it next year, and might end up paying a nine- or ten-digit sum into the same fund in a year or two. That might deter other banks from dealing with Pyongyang and its agents.

I wish the Warmbiers success, condolence, and whatever closure a judgment can give them. My greatest regret is that North Korea itself may escape from paying for the suffering and death it inflicted on this young man. My second-greatest regret is that they didn’t sue Young Pioneer Tours and its irresponsible and unethical owner, Gareth Johnson, who helped lure him to that fate with his fraudulent assurances of safety.

~   ~   ~

Update, March 2019: Here is the court’s decision: Warmbier Memorandum and Opinion

1 Response