EU Investigating Forced N. Korean Labor
Update: More at the Daily NK.
You may recall my previous post (and R. Elgin’s) about the use of female North Korean slave laborers to stitch upholstery for German luxury sedans, which certainly brings back a few memories about the golden age of German business ethics. It looks like that source of income will soon come to an end, as the European Parliament is now investigating the conditions under which North Koreans labor in the Czech Republic and Poland. It expects to complete its investigation by next spring.
It is estimated that the number of workers that the North Korean government sent to overseas countries such as the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia, the Middle East, and Africa is anywhere from 10,000 to 15,000. Currently, 400 North Korean workers, mostly women, are staying in the Czech Republic and working in sewing factories in the suburbs of Prague, the capital of the Czech Republic.
Their monthly salaries are well above the country’s minimum wage of about 285,000 won. However, the European Parliament estimated that a large part of their salaries is deposited into a collective bank account controlled by the North Korean government. In addition to this, the North Korean government takes away more of workers’ salaries by forcing them to buy propaganda videos produced by the government.
That’s a novel technique.
The Mainichi Daily also covered the case of one North Korean man who is working for a shipbuilding company located in Gdansk in the northern part of Poland. The story reported that North Korean workers’ salaries goes to the bank account of a North Korea’s state enterprise first, and in the end only 30 or 40 percent of it is left in the hands of workers.
A source from a company that arranges North Korean workers to go to factories in Poland said, “They get paid 4,000 Zloty, or about 1.3 million won, a month, which is sent to the bank account in Poland of a North Korea state enterprise, and workers are only receiving 400,000 or 500,000 won a month.
There are two ways of looking at that, as I mentioned previously. The workers have no freedom of choice, and their wages and working conditions are certainly much worse than they are for Europeans. At the same time, they’re much, much better than in North Korea.
István Szent-Iványi, vice-chairman of the delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula in the European Parliament, said, “North Korean workers are treated like slaves now because they are working under inhuman conditions and thoroughly monitored by their government.
However, one senior North Korean worker (aged 45) at a shipbuilding company in Gdansk said, “We are well fed now and enjoy a glass of beer every day. Every day seems to me like my birthday and the North Korean Embassy in Warsaw even delivers kimchi to us.
How considerate of North Korea to feed its workers. On one hand, this system seems to feed and clothe a select few workers adequately, and to give them a real glimpse of liberal Europe. But if there’s an operational definition of slavery, it’s when they pay you in food and alcohol. On balance, what’s really the most wrong with this is the system it helps to support.
Homomercantilism.
I think it’s counter productive to shut down the factories. Our ultimate goal is the annihilation of DPRK information control. If we kick out DPRK workers in europe, then all it accomplishes is make it a bit harder for KJI to buy his goodies. In a better world we can perhaps bribe the political officers and show some freedom to the rest of the workers.
You figure that these people in Europe are probably the ideological loyal, “upper class” of DPRK. In the end, we need to convince these people to put a bullet in KJI’s head. These guys are another useful vectors in breaking down the information blockade.
Obviously, I see your point, but I don’t agree with it.
The problem with that argument, like the argument for sustaining Kaesong and importing its products, is that it requires us to give North Korea a special exemption from our international labor standards, and now, from Resolution 1718.
Can you think of any country less deserving of its own special set of lowered standards?
I think it’s admirable that you want to uphold international laws. But I don’t think it’s practical to hold this moral high grounds when the vast majority of UN member nation won’t adhere to it. If we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t, why can’t we damn kji along with us?
This again raises an excellent question: why bother going to the UN if its resolutions are meaningless? You’re fast-tracking us to that abdiction a bit quickly, aren’t you?