13 January 2010: Sarah Palin Unwittingly Makes Case for Withdrawing Most of USFK (Update: Palin Denies)
SHE COULD HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT NORTH KOREA:
One of the hallmarks of a regime in financial trouble is a complicated regime of “special” exchange rates aimed at getting around the problems caused by financial mismanagement. The devaluation that Venezuela announced last week may have been a good idea, given the country’s recession, and the problems of declining oil revenues. But the way Chavez has gone about the thing is typically ham-fisted. By Sunday, he was threatening to deploy the military against . . . shopkeepers who raised prices in response to the devaluation, as if fiat were the main component of import prices. [Megan McArdle, The Atlantic]
YOUR “WE ARE ONE” MOMENT FOR TODAY, via the New York Times, now with 50% less sarcasm:
One October evening, when the students had gone camping and stayed up late, Moon Sung-il, a 14-year-old North Korean, brought tears to the South Koreans’ eyes when he recounted his two-and-a-half-year flight with other defectors that took him through China, Myanmar and a refugee camp in Bangkok. But he stunned them when he said that none of this was as daunting as a South Korean classroom.
“I could hardly understand anything the teacher said,” he said. “My classmates, who were all a year or two younger than I was, taunted me as a “˜poor soup-eater from the North.’ I fought them with my fists.
ISN’T IT CUTE when North Korea rails against censorship in KCNA?
“LET MR. SHIN’S WORDS HANG HIM:” That’s usually the best way to deal with any ass who at least refrains from violence.
SARAH PALIN DIDN’T KNOW why there were two Koreas? My views on this topic are guaranteed to please absolutely no one. On one hand, and speaking as a former USFK soldier for crying out loud, that’s the lapse of an unintelligent person, but then, my own impression of Palin has always been of a nice, decent, down-to-earth person who lacks the experience and gravitas for national office. On the other hand, Palin doesn’t seem any dumber than Harry Reid or John Edwards, any more gaffe-prone than Joe Biden, or any more dogmatic than Nancy Pelosi, yet the columnists don’t write about Reid or Pelosi, they write about Palin — constantly. Don’t even get me started with the vacuous Edwards — most of the press positively covered for him through most of the election season, while he still held delegates and leverage in a tightly contested nomination, and left the watch-dogging to The National Enquirer. This is somewhat akin to my ambivalence about Israel: one need not be especially fond of how Israel behaves at times to perceive a double standard that often looks more like an unhealthy obsession than principled criticism.
Update: Palin calls the accusation “a lie.” I sure hope so. For what it’s worth, I hated Palin’s convention speech but thought she did fine in the debate. But of course, beating Joe Biden in a debate is like beating Stephen Hawking at racket ball.
GOOGLE THREATENS TO LEAVE CHINA, refuses to help censor searches, after Chi-bots hack into activists’ e-mail accounts. Chinese fascism is eventually doing to destroy itself with this sort of arrogance and hubris, but who else will it destroy first?
AN INCH IS NEVER ENOUGH: Tensions with China, despite Clinton’s early suck-up on human rights.
I think you summed up Sarah Palin very well. I think her joining Fox News should help her get more up to speed on international issues but I just don’t see her being a viable candidate in 2012.
America will vote based on disillusionment with the current regime, regardless of who emerges as the GOP front-runner.
Who do you think is pulling the media strings on the Palin stories?
They’re not so much strings as hard wires.
I think the popular press would be lost if they couldn’t attack Mrs. Palin for things real or imagined (largely imagined).
I assumed there was some sort of intermediate program for North Korean students to help them adjust. As for the kids who pick on them, let them scrape gum from under desks after school.
“I think the popular press would be lost if they couldn’t attack Mrs. Palin for things real or imagined (largely imagined).”
The press are the puppets. Joshua is playing coy and won’t tell us who he thinks the puppeteers are.
No, I’m a confirmed atheist about most conspiracy theories. The media hatred of Sarah Palin is both too widespread and too visceral to be conspired. It’s from the heart. But it’s the antithesis of objectivity.
So you think these weekly installments of Sarah-Palin-Is-Dumb stories are either fabricated or innocently mentioned in passing by former McCain staffers and not a deliberate effort by some in the Republican party to torpedo the slimmest chance Palin might have in 2012?
I hadn’t given much thought to the fratricide angle, because most of the Palin-Is-Dumb stories are coming from the left. Lately, they’ve resurfaced on the same flagrantly biased television program that tried to pass off those fake National Guard memos about George W. Bush right before the 2004 elections. If this is a conspiracy to use and discard Ms. Palin once she outlives her usefulness, it seems to be one with limited support within the GOP establishment. Some members of the Republican establishment are backing Palin anyway, and most of the conservative blogs are fans. Many are encouraging her to run in 2012.
Yes, you’re right, some of Palin’s primary detractors on the right are the very same people who picked her as the nominee. But does that make it a conspiracy? Why conspire against her? I can’t see any motive for McCain’s people to torpedo Palin. The torpedoing started almost as soon as the election ended, so I doubt they had already signed up with Guiliani or Romney already. They’re not blaming Palin for McCain’s loss, either; on 60 Minutes, Steve Schmitt said that Palin kept Obama’s margin of victory from being even greater.
The other plausible possibility is that those former McCain staffers, in their desperation to find someone with appeal to certain voter blocs, picked someone who cost them their single best issue: Obama’s lack of experience and apparent qualification for the presidency. That’s not an issue McCain could afford to give up, given his age. If this is a late-breaking realization on their part, it speaks poorly of their vetting skills and their patriotism. If that’s the case, they either recklessly or knowingly chose, out of pure political self-interest, someone unready to assume the presidency.
Sarah Palin has Alaskan Native (Eskimo) in her family. Alaskan Natives share the same lineage as Koreans. When I visited Alaska, I was surprised to see that the Alaskan Natives had similar facial features as Koreans.
I idolize Sarah Palin because she is a woman with very strong character. She has also lots of accomplishments in the area of public service.~~~~