Sen. Gardner calls on Congress to pass North Korea sanctions bill
Amid all of the slaughter and chaos sweeping over us, Senator Cory Gardner doesn’t want us to forget which government built a nuclear reactor in Syria in 2007, and that may soon be able to put a nuclear warhead on an intercontinental ballistic missile.
It is time to ratchet up the pressure. That is why I’ve introduced the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act. This bill would require the president to impose sanctions on people who have contributed to North Korea’s nuclear program, enabled its human rights abuses, and engaged in money laundering, counterfeiting or drug trafficking that benefits the regime.
North Korea skirts financial sanctions by setting up shell companies in countries like China. This bill would add pressure by asking the Treasury Department to designate North Korea “a country of primary money laundering concern” under the Patriot Act.
Similarly, North Korea evades U.N. embargoes on arms trafficking. This bill would authorize the Department of Homeland Security to seize any ships the regime uses for smuggling if they enter U.S. waters. It also asks the president to identify foreign ports that are not doing enough to prevent smuggling.[Sen. Cory Gardner, Wall Street Journal]
Senator Gardner’s bill, S. 2144, shares most of its content with H.R. 757, a bill introduced by Rep. Ed Royce (R., Cal.) and Rep. Elliot Engel (D., N.Y.). In several ways, S. 2144 improves on its elder sibling. Hopefully, as the bills work their way through their respective committees and chambers, they will converge in a form that combines their best elements. That needs to happen soon, because we’re already near the end of the first session of this Congress. Time is finite, and unfortunately, it seems the only person who can get the whole Congress’s attention is Kim Jong-Un.
Events may soon favor Sen. Gardner’s call, because Kim Jong-Un also doesn’t want us to forget about Kim Jong-Un. The day after the Wall Street Journal published Sen. Gardner’s op-ed, 38 North published images showing that North Korea is digging a new tunnel at its nuclear test site at Punggye-ri. Perhaps, then, tomorrow’s crisis might crowd into a few of the news cycles that have been preoccupied, lately, with the slaughter of the week. If that’s what it takes to get us toward a policy that recognizes the North Korea that is, rather than the North Korea we would prefer to believe in, so much the better.
Historically, North Korea’s nuclear tests have come every three or four years, so we’re about due. If what His Porcine Majesty most needs now is to whip up xenophobic hostility to distract his ruling class from their fears of him, and if he thinks he’s reached the limits of what Park Geun-Hye will tolerate, maybe a nuclear test is just what he needs in the short term. But if his survival depends on ready access to hard currency in his Chinese and Swiss bank accounts, in the long term, this might mean the end of him.
I read the gray box above, and then I read Sen. Gardner’s WSJ article (http://www.wsj.com/articles/sanction-north-koreas-forgotten-maniac-1449014106). In both of these, I saw the words “ask” / “asking“. I really need to see the words “force” / “forcing“, or “require” / “requiring“. Then, I looked at the bill itself (http://go.bloomberg.com/assets/content/uploads/sites/2/North-Korea-Bill.pdf). I don’t see any teeth in it at all:
Pages 26 – 27 for example “urge“[s] the president to I guess address Nork Empire money laundering.
Page 28 “requires” a report to “appropriate congressional committees” re: Nork money laundering.
Page 36 has a requirement – for some sort of contractor certification.
Page 39 has lotsa bureaucratic requirements that control American behavior(s), but nothing that directly / indirectly controls North Korean behavior(s).
Page 52 gives the president the power to lift sanctions, essentially at presidential discretion!
IANAL, but I just don’t see anything in this bill that requires or forces the president to actually squeeze / pressure / etc. Nork Empire finances in ways that will motivate better behavior out of them. If anything, this bill looks like it will preserve / protect / expand Nork financial health and wealth. If I read it right, King Little Fatso III would probably support this bill . . .
Reread section 104(a).