[T]he Foreign Ministry’s special envoy on international security, Moon Chung-in, in a phone interview with the Chosun Ilbo elaborated on remarks a day earlier that Roh “is losing patience with U.S. President George W. Bush.

Today, my friends, I write to you from a city living in fear. As our President, George W. Bush, sits in the White House nibbling compulsively at the bleeding tendrils where there were fingernails just a day ago, a cunning tiger holds court from his lair in Seoul, balancing the fate of the world on a rocky fulcrum called Tokdo.

On each set of trembling lips the same questions are poised, all asking what Roh will do: Will he announce a withdrawal of Korean troops from Iraq? How would we ever fill that gaping hole in our front line? How would we ever defend Alaska? Who would buy our beef, rice, or cars? How would we keep the pressure on North Korea to disarm, or contain China’s ambitions? How can Chimpy Bushitler have squandered the goodwill of such an affectionate friend as Korea? Will we be denied the privilege, one we had all taken as God-given for so long, of defending this most holy of all earthly lands?

Asked whether a clash in North Korea policy between Seoul and Washington looms, Moon said, “We have not come up with any concrete measures yet and the situation will be determined by how Seoul coordinates its measures with Washington. But he added, “If the U.S. cannot accept the measures we take, it may create a rift between Seoul and Washington.

I have three words for Mr. Moon: horse, barn, door.

You can’t be dependent and independent at the same time. If you choose to accept U.S. protection, then you’re in an alliance, which implies a unity of vital interests that each nation is obliged to carefully consider, in consultation with the other, before making unilateral policy pronouncements. If you don’t have that unity of interests, then you should probably be independent, which is a completely different thing than public hostility, but which doesn’t come with guarantees of mutual military assistance, either.

In other words, life is full of choices, and eventually, you need to make one. If you want the benefits of independence, you have to give up the benefits of dependence. You can either do it quietly, or make a lot of noise, which tends to scare away investors and causes other nations not to take you seriously.

It seems remarkable that professional diplomats actually say things like this in public, unless you recall that Korea purged many of its professional diplomats years ago, in favor of middle-aged radicals and partisan hacks who are sometimes called Roh’s “Taliban.” There’s simply no purpose in this but domestic political consumption before an election where Roh stands to take the kind of beating that will seal his political extinction, and that of his party. Real diplomats don’t engage in public pissing matches. They take quiet, well-considered action in accordance with their interests.

And our interests? Those lie in disarming North Korea — with or without South Korea’s cooperation — and in extricating 32,000 American hostages from an outmoded and entangling alliance with dangerously emotional juveniles.

3 Responses

  1. The line from Roh about US-SK joint exercies was the big one for me this week.

    It has seemed for the past couple of years the US military establishment was getting tired of Korea, and the call for split command during war must have increased that —

    —and if Roh goes into making a deal with NK including ending all or most training exercies in South Korea —-

    I can imagine orders coming down the pipe in the Pentagon to prepare the most efficient exit plans for USFK.

    We heard not long ago the inner circles of the Blue House had discussed shutting down the most recent exercies before they took place.

    I say — Go Roh….

    Push for what you were elected for, and all the best of luck to Uri party in this and next year’s election.

    Uri Party 2007!!

  2. Well, keep your focus on the bigger prize, which is for Korea to be united and free. A decline of 2/3 of Korea’s people and half of its territory into chaos is not a good thing. What would be a good thing would be for Korea to find its national soul, will, and perspective, and to seek prompt reunification as a free and independent nation. I simply think the US presence is fostering an unhealthy dependency and is getting in the way of Korea reaching political maturity and responsibility. It’s also risky and expensive for America. A longer-term security relationship with Korea is more likely, as I see it, if the US withdraws its ground forces quickly.